Current:Home > MyNorth Carolina appeals court upholds ruling that kept Confederate monument in place -Global Finance Compass
North Carolina appeals court upholds ruling that kept Confederate monument in place
View
Date:2025-04-14 20:11:59
RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — A North Carolina appeals court ruled Tuesday that local leaders who refused calls to remove a Confederate monument from outside a county courthouse acted in a constitutional manner and kept in place the statue at its longtime location in accordance with state law.
The three-judge panel unanimously upheld a trial court judge’s decision to side with Alamance County and its commissioners over the 30 foot (9.1 meter)-tall statue, which features a Confederate infantryman perched at the top. The state NAACP, the Alamance NAACP chapter, and other groups and individuals had sued the county and its leaders in 2021 after the commissioners rejected calls to take the statue down.
Confederate monuments in North Carolina, as elsewhere nationwide, were a frequent focal point for racial inequality protests in the late 2010s, and particularly in 2020 following the murder of George Floyd by a Minneapolis police officer. North Carolina legislators enacted a law in 2015 that limits when an “object of remembrance” such as a military monument can be relocated.
The lawsuit’s plaintiffs said the county and the commissioners violated the state constitution by exercising discriminatory intent to protect a symbol of white supremacy outside the historic Alamance County Courthouse, thus creating the appearance of racial prejudice there.
In the opinion, Court of Appeals Chief Judge Chris Dillon wrote that the county commissioners lacked authority under the 2015 law to remove the statue. He also said the county manager’s email to commissioners in June 2020, in which he asked them to consider removing the monument out of concern for protesters’ safety, did not qualify for an exception to that law.
“At all times, the Monument Protection Law required the County to leave the Monument in its current place,” Dillon wrote. He added that a provision in the state constitution intended to ensure state courts are open to the public doesn’t prohibit the placement of objects of historical remembrance in and around a courthouse. The courthouse monument was dedicated in 1914.
“Indeed, in many courthouses and other government buildings across our State and nation, there are depictions of historical individuals who held certain views in their time many today would find offensive,” Dillon wrote.
Judges Donna Stroud and Valerie Zachary joined in the opinion.
Even with the 2015 law, Confederate monuments in North Carolina have been taken down in recent years, sometimes through force.
In 2018, protesters tore down a Confederate statue known as “Silent Sam” at the University of North Carolina campus at Chapel Hill. Statues of soldiers from the North Carolina Confederate Monument on the old Capitol grounds in Raleigh came down in June 2020. Gov. Roy Cooper, citing public safety, directed that the remainder of the monument and two others on Capitol grounds be removed.
The state Supreme Court is currently considering litigation stemming from a 2021 decision by the Asheville City Council to dismantle an obelisk honoring Civil War-era Gov. Zebulon Vance.
veryGood! (9266)
Related
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- American tourist killed in shark attack in Bahamas, police say
- Mackenzie Phillips Addresses Alleged 10-Year Incestuous Relationship With Her Dad John
- 'Standing on business': What the internet's latest slang term means and how to use it.
- Why members of two of EPA's influential science advisory committees were let go
- Julia Roberts Reveals the Simple rules She Sets for Her Teenage Kids
- More bodies found after surprise eruption of Indonesia’s Mount Marapi, raising apparent toll to 23
- Jonathan Majors assault trial starts with competing versions of a backseat confrontation
- US wholesale inflation accelerated in November in sign that some price pressures remain elevated
- World carbon dioxide emissions increase again, driven by China, India and aviation
Ranking
- Charges tied to China weigh on GM in Q4, but profit and revenue top expectations
- UConn falls to worst ranking in 30 years in women’s AP Top 25; South Carolina, UCLA stay atop poll
- Derek Chauvin returned to prison following stabbing, lawyer says
- Virginia officer seriously wounded in gunfire exchange that left stabbing suspect dead, police say
- Man can't find second winning lottery ticket, sues over $394 million jackpot, lawsuit says
- Israel strikes in and around Gaza’s second largest city in an already bloody new phase of the war
- Former Miss America Runner-Up Cullen Johnson Hill Shares Her Addiction Struggles After Jail Time
- Niger’s junta revokes key security agreements with EU and turns to Russia for defense partnership
Recommendation
Federal Spending Freeze Could Have Widespread Impact on Environment, Emergency Management
Massachusetts lawmakers overcome efforts to block money for temporary shelters for migrant families
NFL Week 13 winners, losers: Packers engineering stunning turnaround to season
US, allies in talks on naval task force to protect shipping in Red Sea after Houthi attacks
A Mississippi company is sentenced for mislabeling cheap seafood as premium local fish
Black Americans expect to face racism in the doctor's office, survey finds
Column: Major champions talk signature shots. And one that stands out to them
Christmas shopping hangover no more: Build a holiday budget to avoid credit card debt