Current:Home > InvestColorado Supreme Court bans Trump from the state’s ballot under Constitution’s insurrection clause -Global Finance Compass
Colorado Supreme Court bans Trump from the state’s ballot under Constitution’s insurrection clause
View
Date:2025-04-13 17:15:01
DENVER (AP) — The Colorado Supreme Court on Tuesday declared former President Donald Trump ineligible for the White House under the U.S. Constitution’s insurrection clause and removed him from the state’s presidential primary ballot, setting up a likely showdown in the nation’s highest court to decide whether the front-runner for the GOP nomination can remain in the race.
The decision from a court whose justices were all appointed by Democratic governors marks the first time in history that Section 3 of the 14th Amendment has been used to disqualify a presidential candidate.
“A majority of the court holds that Trump is disqualified from holding the office of president under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment,” the court wrote in its 4-3 decision.
Colorado’s highest court overturned a ruling from a district court judge who found that Trump incited an insurrection for his role in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol, but said he could not be barred from the ballot because it was unclear that the provision was intended to cover the presidency.
The court stayed its decision until Jan. 4, or until the U.S. Supreme Court rules on the case.
“We do not reach these conclusions lightly,” wrote the court’s majority. “We are mindful of the magnitude and weight of the questions now before us. We are likewise mindful of our solemn duty to apply the law, without fear or favor, and without being swayed by public reaction to the decisions that the law mandates we reach.”
Trump’s attorneys had promised to appeal any disqualification immediately to the nation’s highest court, which has the final say about constitutional matters. His campaign said it was working on a response to the ruling.
Trump lost Colorado by 13 percentage points in 2020 and doesn’t need the state to win next year’s presidential election. But the danger for the former president is that more courts and election officials will follow Colorado’s lead and exclude Trump from must-win states.
Colorado officials say the issue must be settled by Jan. 5, the deadline for the state to print its presidential primary ballots.
Dozens of lawsuits have been filed nationally to disqualify Trump under Section 3, which was designed to keep former Confederates from returning to government after the Civil War. It bars from office anyone who swore an oath to “support” the Constitution and then “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” against it, and has been used only a handful of times since the decade after the Civil War.
The Colorado case is the first where the plaintiffs succeeded. After a weeklong hearing in November, District Judge Sarah B. Wallace found that Trump indeed had “engaged in insurrection” by inciting the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, and her ruling that kept him on the ballot was a fairly technical one.
Trump’s attorneys convinced Wallace that, because the language in Section 3 refers to “officers of the United States” who take an oath to “support” the Constitution, it must not apply to the president, who is not included as an “officer of the United States” elsewhere in the document and whose oath is to “preserve, protect and defend” the Constitution.
The provision also says offices covered include senator, representative, electors of the president and vice president, and all others “under the United States,” but doesn’t name the presidency.
The state’s highest court didn’t agree, siding with attorneys for six Colorado Republican and unaffiliated voters who argued that it was nonsensical to imagine the framers of the amendment, fearful of former Confederates returning to power, would bar them from low-level offices but not the highest one in the land.
“You’d be saying a rebel who took up arms against the government couldn’t be a county sheriff, but could be the president,” attorney Jason Murray said in arguments before the court in early December.
veryGood! (9)
Related
- FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
- Former Nickelodeon TV show creator Dan Schneider denies toxic workplace allegations
- Open seat for Chicago-area prosecutor is in voters’ hands after spirited primary matchup
- When is spring 2024? What to know about the vernal equinox as we usher in a new season
- 2025 'Doomsday Clock': This is how close we are to self
- Sunken 18th century British warship in Florida identified as the lost 'HMS Tyger'
- Judge approves new murder charges against man in case of slain Indiana teens
- $510 Dodgers jerseys and $150 caps. Behold the price of being an Ohtani fan in Japan
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- Brooke Burke Weighs In On Ozempic's Benefits and Dangers
Ranking
- Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
- Iowa women's basketball star Caitlin Clark featured in ESPN docuseries airing in May
- Social media influencer is charged with joining the Jan. 6 attack on the US Capitol
- Pennsylvania House speaker pushes for same-day registration and widely available early voting
- Trump's 'stop
- What is the average life expectancy? And how to improve your longevity.
- 11-year-old fatally stabbed while trying to protect pregnant mother from attacker, officials say
- 'My body won't cooperate any longer': Ex-Cowboys LB Leighton Vander Esch retires from NFL
Recommendation
The Best Stocking Stuffers Under $25
Arizona governor vetoes bill that some lawmakers hoped would help fix housing crisis
Alaska lawmakers fail to override the governor’s education package veto
Wales elects Vaughan Gething, first Black national leader in Europe
Most popular books of the week: See what topped USA TODAY's bestselling books list
Apple may hire Google to build Gemini AI engine into next-generation iPhone
Women's NCAA Tournament 2024: Full schedule, times, how to watch all March Madness games
Former Vice President Mike Pence calls Trump's Jan. 6 hostage rhetoric unacceptable