Current:Home > StocksJudge says trial is required to decide government’s antitrust case over Google’s advertising tech -Global Finance Compass
Judge says trial is required to decide government’s antitrust case over Google’s advertising tech
View
Date:2025-04-16 10:42:43
ALEXANDRIA, Va. (AP) — A federal judge on Friday said the government’s antitrust case against Google over its advertising technology will go to trial in September, rejecting both sides’ request to rule in their favor as a matter of law.
The Justice Department and Google had been expected to make their arguments seeking summary judgment in the lawsuit next week. But at a hearing Friday in federal court in Alexandria on unrelated issues, U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema told both sides that it’s clear the case has to go trial.
A judge grants summary judgment only when the facts are not in dispute and a decision can be rendered as a matter of law. But Brinkema said it’s clear that numerous facts are disputed.
Her ruling was not unexpected.
The lawsuit alleges that Google violated federal antitrust laws by building a monopoly on the technology that powers online advertising.
The Justice Department had initially sought a jury trial to decide the case, but last week Brinkema canceled the jury trial and replaced it with a bench trial, meaning she will decide whether Google has broken the law.
Google is awaiting a verdict from another judge in the District of Columbia over whether its popular search engine constitutes an illegal monopoly.
The trial is set for Sept. 9.
veryGood! (117)
Related
- How to watch the 'Blue Bloods' Season 14 finale: Final episode premiere date, cast
- In this country, McDonald's will now cater your wedding
- In New York’s 16th Congressional District, a Progressive Challenge to the Democratic Establishment Splits Climate Groups
- We battle Planet Money for indicator of the year
- Jamie Foxx gets stitches after a glass is thrown at him during dinner in Beverly Hills
- Detlev Helmig Was Frugal With Tax Dollars. Then CU Fired Him for Misusing Funds.
- Video: Regardless of Results, Kentucky’s Primary Shows Environmental Justice is an Issue for Voters
- Cupshe Blowout 70% Off Sale: Get $5 Swimsuits, $9 Bikinis, $16 Dresses, and More Major Deals
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- Pregnant Stassi Schroeder Wants to Try Ozempic After Giving Birth
Ranking
- Most popular books of the week: See what topped USA TODAY's bestselling books list
- Global Carbon Emissions Unlikely to Peak Before 2040, IEA’s Energy Outlook Warns
- In bad news for true loves, inflation is hitting the 12 Days of Christmas
- AP Macro gets a makeover (Indicator favorite)
- Meet the volunteers risking their lives to deliver Christmas gifts to children in Haiti
- Pregnant Athlete Tori Bowie Spoke About Her Excitement to Become a Mom Before Her Death
- Dwyane Wade Weighs In On Debate Over Him and Gabrielle Union Splitting Finances 50/50
- German Election Prompts Hope For Climate Action, Worry That Democracies Can’t Do Enough
Recommendation
Working Well: When holidays present rude customers, taking breaks and the high road preserve peace
Trump says he'd bring back travel ban that's even bigger than before
Shannen Doherty Recalls “Overwhelming” Fear Before Surgery to Remove Tumor in Her Head
Wells Fargo to pay $3.7 billion settling charges it wrongfully seized homes and cars
New Zealand official reverses visa refusal for US conservative influencer Candace Owens
Republicans plan more attacks on ESG. Investors still plan to focus on climate risk
The case of the two Grace Elliotts: a medical bill mystery
Wells Fargo to pay $3.7 billion settling charges it wrongfully seized homes and cars